Climate change, and the need to act now
Just saw this news article while playing around with this news map application.
It’s a flash based web interface which shows news stories from Google News. The most talked about news items get a bigger box (talked about items are ranked by how many related articles there are). A very interesting approach at laying out the daily news.
It also shows you how much attention is given to each individual issue. And some issues do deserve more attention than they are otherwise given.
Perhaps with the blogosphere, we can use it to highlight other important “issues” that are otherwise not given much coverage by the mainstream media.
Here is a comment to one of my blogs posts over on the Melbourne Metroblog (comment written by Winza):
As a water-poor country that’s susceptible to climate extremes in terms of droughts and floods, we need do more to protect our natural resources. It is not just water that we need to protect because everything’s connected – land clearing for example would have adverse impacts on water quality.
And even though we have the technology to mitigate pollution and climate change, we still need to be cautious about what we’re about to do or what we’re about to buy because the more we consume, the larger our ecological footprint and the bigger the impact on the environment.
…
Not many people right now are considering about the future of our planet and we can’t really do anything but to spread the word and to think before we act.
Alright, back to the two articles I linked to earlier, one is titled “Coverting All Cars: Hydrogen Would Have Big Impact“, the other “Pollution Free Hydrogen based fuel for Energy“.
Without having read the two articles, what would that suggest to you?
To me it suggests one big thing, converting all current vehicles from Petroleum based over to Hydrogen based fuel would have a big impact on how much pollution we are creating.
I remember when I visited Bangkok for the first time in 1996, people were walking around with white masks on. My uncle told me it was due to how much pollution there was in the air over there. Pollution generated by the vehicles (motorbikes, tuk tuks, cars, buses and so on…). I don’t know if the situation has improved of late or gotten worse. I’m almost certain it has gotten worse, which is a shame.
When the news item on China trying to buy an American oil firm, we started talking about firstly, the demand for more vehicle transport (moving away from the humble bicycle) and then onto the pollution factor that this will cause to the breathability of the air over there, as well as the effects to the environment. They may not see the effects now, but they will in time.
As China continues it’s rise, from a financial standpoint it’s pollution generating factor will be on the increase. But this is not just a factor for China, but also for surrounding countries as well.
I really don’t want someday when a view like this is only a distant memory for our decendants generations from now rather than something they can visit easily. We should be protecting and preserving what we have now so that future generations can see what we see.
Let’s now not trash our planet.
Think of the consequences.
This post from the WorldChanging blog on The Tsunami and Climate Change states:
the Tsunami was not caused by climate change, but we can expect to see more disasters like it if climate change gets as bad as now expected.
Climate change may already be having profound effects: unusual weather disasters killed 75,000 people in the developing world in 2003, and hundreds of thousands more lost their homes. Things are expected to get much worse: by the 2080s, as many as 200 million people may have been made refugees by climate instability. If the models are even half right, big swathes of the world are going to be experiencing massive disasters on a pretty regular basis.
We know that the planet’s climate is changing. We know that we’re largely responsible. We know that the poorest people on Earth will be hardest hit. We also know how to do many things to help them live better now, and better withstand the heavy weather that’s on its way. The only question is whether we care enough to put our knowledge to use.
This divide between rich and poor nations aren’t going to get any better, and if it does, we have a bigger worry on our hands than who is rich, and who is bombing whom. All this living in fear of terrorists. What does any of that matter if we don’t do something to salvage this mighty planet of ours?
What will it take for people around the world to take notice of the natural disasters occuring worldwide due to climate change, much of which can be attributed to pollution?
Will another Boxing Day Tsunami type disaster to wake people up? Why should we wait until something happens before we fix it, rather than doing something now to prevent it from happening?
Wealthy countries should be spending money helping their poorer neighbours with implementing strategies to reduce pollution, as well as looking at minimising the pollution being output in their own country.
Wake up world! This beautiful green planet of ours is changing, much of it we can help slow the process of. The standard of living worldwide is in need of a lift, and pollution is just one of those things that is dragging it down.
June 29th, 2005 at 04:38 am
I LOVED that application that formats the news based on the number of stories. It is interesting what people consider news and how different countries consider different things news. Now it might be a weighting issue, but I was surprized at how many “American” stories were tops in the UK and in AU. I would expect some, but it was really very much like the US stories.
We in the US think we are the most important country in the world, and it looks like we have convinced the news stations in other countries to believe that.
Thanks for the link.
And regarding pollution. The Rich will always have their own Oxygen bottled for their children so they don’t need to worry.
June 29th, 2005 at 09:08 am
spocko, but what about the rest of the non-rich world?
Just because the rich has the money, it doesn’t give them the right to abuse something that will have adverse affects on the rest of the world, does it? The earth is like a gift that must be shared equally among all those who populate it, from the animals, to the humans.
All the animals will suffer, people will someday look back to their childhood when they visited the zoo and wildlife sanctuaries and wonder “so what happened to that cute fuzzy animal that I used to see at the zoo?” and the answer may possibly be “oh, due to all the pollution and land clearing that’s happening around the earth many years ago, their entire population died out and those that were left in captivity were the last of their kind. Unfortunately there is no way to revive that animal now.”…
With regards to the news map application, do remember that there is also the “world” section of the news whereby the media will report on what is happening around the world. And since the US is such a big country, with a lot happening (rightly or wrongly), it gets reported in the news. If you actually look at the local media in those particular countries, the amount of bias towards news from US is a little different to what is presented in that news map app.
Here are a few local Australian news services: News Ltd, Fairfax, NineMSN, 7 News, ABC News, SBS (Note, SBS is a tv station that focuses on International World news).
Also note that when the newsmap counts the news sources, it also counts the news sources from outside of that country. Even if there is only a tiny bit of news on that particular news story in that particular country, so the weight of the story that appears on newsmap may not be reflective of how much actual focus it receives over here.